Report of the Peer Learning Workshop
Background information
Participants
to this workshop were drawn mainly from the three project areas of
Bayamose, Tiwi, and Tsunza. However for purposes of learning
participation was invited from other groups with whom the Center has
done work in partnership with Ufadhili on locally driven development
using local resources. It is this initial partnership that concretized
into the poverty project in the three principal sites. This was to
stimulate learning and peer review. The other participants were drawn
from the pilots with Ufadhili namely Siaya, Kisumu, Nairobi (Uhuru and
Kangemi). The learning workshop was essentially a forum for discussing
community development processes and activities. (See workshop program
and list of participants, in appendix one and two respectively).
The
workshop began with ice breaking; this was to make participants feel
freer with each other in the workshop. Ice breaking also helps people
to forget about their families and start making new friends. The
program was adopted without any change, and everyone agreed that it
looked flexible enough. Each person recalling the names of their
neighbors who had introduced themselves before saying their names did
introductions. This was also done during the prayer session where every
individual was requested to say only one word to construct a prayer
workshop. It was so participatory and no one was left behind.
Facilitators
Name
Organization
Chief Facilitator Otieno
Ombok
Chemchemi Ya Ukweli
Facilitators Andrew
Hongo Green Development Group
Aggrey
Omondi
Ugunja Comm. Resource Center
Patrick Ochieng
Ujamaa center
Mumo
Kivuitu
Ufadhili
Rappoerteur
Saul Amwomo
Organizers
Ujamaa Center & Ufadhili (It is with Ufadhili that development
conversation in the 3 communities in the coast originally commenced.
Whereas the HBF project picked up the coast sites Ufadhili carried on
with others outside coast. This made learning very rich. Ufadhili took
care of costs for its members and travel)
Representation
Women 4 People
Men 12 people
Participants expectations
The
participants were asked to write their expectations on a small piece of
paper and present it to the plenary. The following were expectations
from the participants.
1. To share information with others
2. To come out with more knowledge at the end of the workshop
3. To understand and share our differences
4. To network with other organizations
5. To feel satisfied at the end of the workshop
6.
To pick new ideas while anticipating to go back to the community and
share this experience with them
7. To learn more about community work
8. To learn more about our natural resources
9. To acquire more knowledge
Norms
Ground
rules are important where people gather together with a mission; it
guides people during the workshop or meeting. Below are the ground
rules set by the participants.
1. Time management
2. There was to be a prayer team
3. Cell phones were to be put on vibration during the session
4. We should respect each other’s opinion
5. We should use only English and Swahili in the workshop room
Workshop objectives
1.
To share lessons learnt from experiences of the project and document
best practices while sharing challenges faced and methods of mitigation
employed
2. To bring together active participants in the field of participatory community development
3. To enable participants to share ideas, exchange and discuss
4.
Participants to leave the workshop with practical tools that can assist
them in development work
Community development theory and practice
Development
is a very popular word everywhere but what does this word mean in our
country Kenya? The facilitator began his session by asking; where
development came from? and Where it was going? Those Questions were
challenging, but on referring back to Kenyan history before 1970, it
was said that to get development Kenya committed itself to have the
following.>
· A good economy
· A healthy Nation
· Education for all
· Agricultural country
· Ignorance, disease and poverty were to be done away with.
Participants
agreed that overwhelming evidence exists to suggest that we are far
from achieving the lofty goals we set for ourselves in the 70’s. a lot
remains to be done if real development is to be realised.
Download the whole article from the library.
|